Search for: "Taylor v. SC " Results 1 - 20 of 46
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 May 2022, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
Campaign Finance South Carolina: “SC GOP Lawmaker Settles 133 Alleged Campaign Finance Violations for Fine, Public Reprimand” by Zak Koeske (The State) for MSN Elections Florida: “Appeals Court Reinstates Florida’s 2021 Election Law Provisions Struck Gown by Judge” by Steven Lemongello (Orlando Sentinel) for MSN Georgia: “Challenge Over Marjorie Taylor Greene’s Eligibility Fails” by Kate Brumback (Associated Press) for Yahoo News … [read post]
8 Sep 2013, 9:45 am by Howard Friedman
LEXIS 126242 (SD GA, Sept. 4, 2013), a Georgia federal magistrate judge recommended that an inmate be permitted to proceed on his complaint that defendant improperly ended his religious meals.In Taylor v. [read post]
19 Feb 2017, 5:00 am by Howard Friedman
LEXIS 19835 (D SC, Feb. 13, 2017), a South Carolina federal district court adopted a magistrate's recommendation (2017 U.S. [read post]
13 Nov 2015, 5:30 pm by David Cheifetz
Consider these paragraphs from Taylor v Great Gulf Group Limited, 2015 ONSC 6891 (CanLII) released on 9 Nov. 2015. [read post]
4 Jul 2011, 4:05 am by Howard Friedman
Supreme Court decision, and damages in his individual capacity claims were precluded by defendants' qualified immunity.In Taylor v. [read post]
1 Jun 2015, 2:12 pm by Kraft Palmer Davies, PLLC
David implanted the trial SCS on Hedges, and Hedges continued with the trial SCS in operation until March 4, 2014. [read post]
21 Sep 2010, 2:47 pm by Howard Friedman
A Utah federal district court found no evidence that plaintiff's conflicts with Sex Offender Treatment Program personnel and the Parole Board were religious in nature.In Taylor v. [read post]
19 Sep 2021, 9:37 am by Eric Goldman
Earlier this year, Florida enacted a wide-ranging, complex, poorly drafted, and enthusiastically censorial law, SB7072. [read post]
5 Apr 2010, 7:41 am by Dave
and (5) what "decision" or "decisions" can be challenged through gateway (b) (that is, just the decision to serve the notice to quit [ntq] or all decisions leading to possession - this is the ongoing battle between two lines of CA judgment, respectively Doran v Liverpool CC [2009] EWCA Civ 146and Central Bedfordshire DC v Taylor [2009] EWCA Civ 613, discussed also in our note of Barber v Croydon LBC [2010] EWCA 51). [read post]
5 Apr 2010, 7:41 am by Dave
and (5) what "decision" or "decisions" can be challenged through gateway (b) (that is, just the decision to serve the notice to quit [ntq] or all decisions leading to possession - this is the ongoing battle between two lines of CA judgment, respectively Doran v Liverpool CC [2009] EWCA Civ 146and Central Bedfordshire DC v Taylor [2009] EWCA Civ 613, discussed also in our note of Barber v Croydon LBC [2010] EWCA 51). [read post]
8 Nov 2015, 4:00 am by Barry Sookman
https://t.co/CQyUg871ZL -> TPP: 'Sc… https://t.co/vfuCbZf1Mr -> Computer and Internet Updates for 2015-11-06 https://t.co/BGex6ZbcNR -> [read post]
9 Jun 2019, 4:26 pm by INFORRM
, Revue des Juristes de Sc Po, vol. 14, 2018. [read post]